Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near TN38 0JB

The Flour Loft, Silchester Mews, Silchester Road, St Leonards on Sea, East Sussex, TN38 0JB

CHI/21UD/LVL/2019/0001 · variation of lease · Hastings · decided 5 Sep 2019

figures not yet checked

The Tribunal refused the leaseholder's application to vary his lease to reduce his service charge share from 50% to 14.5%, finding the lease was clear and workable and not unsatisfactory under section 35, and that the Respondent's costs application remained outstanding.

OutcomeDismissed or struck out
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordBrowood Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingOne flat, 6 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputeinsurance, repairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder
the lessor is Browood Limited, of which Mr [name] is a director
outcome
The application for a variation of his lease is therefore refused.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.