The Exchange Queen St Hitchin SG4 9TY
CAM/26UF/LSC/2020/0034 · service charges · North Hertfordshire · decided 9 Jul 2021
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the car park maintenance costs were reasonably incurred but required credits to the service charge for the gym's and BT's contributions, which were not collected, and made orders that the respondents' costs are not chargeable to leaseholders and that the respondents repay £300 in fees.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Fairmead Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Firstport Property Services Ltd |
| Building | A block, 24 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | Respondents to reimburse Applicants' application and hearing fees £300 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
to provide 2 [name] and 24 residential apartments.
- freeholder
The Second Respondent is the lessor under the various sub-leases, and is
- agent
The First Respondent is the management company under their various
- years
(a) 2009/2010; (b) 2010/2011; (c) 2011/2012; (d) 2012/2013;
- outcome
must be adjusted by the First Respondent to give a credit of 4/46 in each year
- items reduced
must be adjusted by the First Respondent to give a credit of 4/46 in each year
- s20c
there should be an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant act 1985
- costs
in the sum of £300
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.