The Cedars Finch Green Chorleywood Herts WD3 5GL
CAM/26UJ/LDC/2020/0017 · dispensation from consultation · Three Rivers · decided 26 Aug 2020
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for replacing the boilers and associated ventilation system at The Cedars, as the application was unopposed and no prejudice was identified.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | RV Property Holdings Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 154 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
development of 154 leasehold independent living retirement properties
- freeholder
1. RV Property Holdings Limited
- outcome
to dispense with all the consultation requirements in relation to works to the boilers and associated ventilation system as described in the application form.
- s20
to dispense with all the consultation requirements in relation to works to the boilers and associated ventilation system as described in the application form.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.