The Block, 19 Cuba Street, London, E14 8LD
LON/00BG/LDC/2023/0273 · dispensation from consultation · Tower Hamlets · decided 26 Feb 2024
The Tribunal granted retrospective dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent lift repair works costing £8,973.24 including VAT, as the works were needed promptly and the leaseholders raised no objection.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 26 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £8,973.24 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
is a purpose-built block consisting of 26 units.
- outcome
The Tribunal grants the application for unconditional retrospective dispensation from statutory consultation in respect of the subject works
- total demanded
at a cost of £8,973.24 (inclusive of VAT).
- s20
The Tribunal grants the application for unconditional retrospective dispensation from statutory consultation in respect of the subject works
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
This decision replaces an earlier one for the same case: 26 Feb 2024.
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.