The Balmoral, 106 Kings Road, Harrogate, North Yorkshire, HG1 5HH
MAN/36UD/LDC/2025/0659 · dispensation from consultation · North Yorkshire · decided 5 Mar 2026
The Tribunal granted retrospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for the roof repair works at The Balmoral, Harrogate, which were completed in October 2025.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Adriatic Land 8 Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Lea Cross IPM Limited |
| Building | A block, 14 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2025 |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
converted from a hotel into 14 apartments in 2018
- freeholder
Applicant : [name] 8 Limited
- agent
Representative : Lea Cross IPM Limited
- years
The roof works were completed on or around 30 October 2025.
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 under section 20ZA of that Act
- s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.