The Atrium, London Road, Liverpool, L3 8JA
MAN/00BY/LDC/2021/0004 · dispensation from consultation · Liverpool · decided 6 Apr 2021
The tribunal granted the management company dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for the removal and replacement of unsafe external cladding at the building, without deciding whether the resulting costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Grey GR Limited Partnership |
| Management company | The Altrium Management Company Ltd |
| Managing agent | Revolution Property Management |
| Building | A block, 27 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
some 27 residential apartments above
- freeholder
The Landlord is Grey GR Limited Partnership.
- management company
Applicant The Altrium Management Company Ltd
- agent
They have instructed Revolution Property Management to act as managing agents.
- outcome
The Tribunal grants this application to dispense with the consultation
- s20
The Tribunal grants this application to dispense with the consultation requirements imposed by section 20
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.