The Acorns, Scarlett Oaks, Camberley, Surrey, GU15 1RD_HAV/43UJ/LDC/2025/0738
HAV/43UJ/LDC/2025/0738 · dispensation from consultation · Surrey Heath · decided 20 Jan 2026
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for replacing the sewage pump at the block of ten flats, finding that the leaseholders were not prejudiced by the lack of consultation.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Wallace Estate Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | JFM Block and Estate Management |
| Building | A block, 10 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a purpose built block of ten flats
- freeholder
Applicant : Wallace Estate Limited
- agent
Representative : JFM Block and Estate Management
- outcome
The Tribunal grants the application for the dispensation of all or any of the
- s20
It is evident that a statutorily compliant consultation has not been carried out by the Applicant
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.