Tabriz Court, Block C, and Shams Court, Block E, 5 Olympic Way, Wembley, Middlesex HA9 0NS
LON/00AE/LSC/2024/0258 · service charges · Brent · decided 17 Mar 2025
The tribunal held that no service charges are payable for works to remedy the fire safety defects under Schedule 8 of the Building Safety Act 2022, and that the insurance costs for 2022 to 2024 were reasonably incurred and are payable in full, with the section 20C and administration charge applications to be decided later on written representations.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | HEB Assets Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Wembley Properties Ltd |
| Building | An estate, 18 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2022, 2023, 2024 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | major works |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
The Respondent, HEB Assets Limited
- agent
it has engaged Wembley Properties Ltd
- years
Insurance costs incurred by the Respondent in the 2022, 2023, and 2024
- outcome
were reasonably incurred and are payable in full by the Applicant
- items reduced
no service charges are payable by the Applicant in respect of works to remedy the relevant defects
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.