Swan Court, East Street, Andover, SP10 1EZ
CHI/24UN/LDC/2022/0056 · dispensation from consultation · Test Valley · decided 28 Sep 2022
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the Stage 1 section 20 consultation requirements for the roof and external major works at Swan Court, finding the leaseholder of Flat 4 suffered no prejudice, subject to the landlord complying with the remaining stages.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | W J Daniel & Company Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 8 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a purpose built block of 8 flats above a parade of shops
- freeholder
Applicant : W J Daniel & Company Limited and
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from Stage 1 of the consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from Stage 1 of the consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of the works described in paragraph 3 of this decision
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.