Sutton Court, 120 Sutton Road, Watford WD17 2QQ
CAM/26UK/LUS/2022/0001 · LUS · Watford · decided 28 Jun 2023
The tribunal ordered both respondents to reimburse the Right to Manage company's £100 application fee because they delayed providing account information, while the section 94(3) claim for uncommitted service charge fell away.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Red Rock Estate & Property Management Limited |
| Building | A block · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021, 2022 |
| Items in dispute | not stated |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondents to reimburse the applicant's application fee of £100 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- agent
2. [name] Estate & Property
- outcome
the Respondents shall reimburse to the Applicant the application fee of £100 within 28 days of the date this Decision
- costs
the Respondents shall reimburse to the Applicant the application fee of £100 within 28 days of the date this Decision
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.