Sussex Heights, St Margaret’s Place, Brighton BN1 2FR
CHI/00ML/LSC/2021/0082 · service charges · Brighton and Hove · decided 24 Jun 2022
The Tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the consultation requirement for a second estimate without conditions, found the proposed external major works reasonable and the related service charges payable, and refused the leaseholders' section 20C application.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation refused |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 116 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2011 |
| Items in dispute | major works, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
containing 116 leasehold flats
- freeholder
The freeholder is [name] (Brighton) Limited, which played no part in this case.
- years
the service charges for 2011 to 2030 insofar as they relate to the funds required for the costs of the major works
- outcome
the service charges for 2011 to 2030 insofar as they relate to the funds required for the costs of the major works and the ongoing maintenance required to retain the benefit of the guarantee for the major works are payable and reasonable.
- s20c
The Tribunal refuses the Respondents’ applications pursuant to section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
The Tribunal grants the Applicant dispensation from compliance with the requirements in Schedule 1 to the Services Charges (Consultation Requirements) (England) Regulations 2003.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.