Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near BH4 9DH

Stevenson Lodge, 39 Pool Road Westbourne BH4 9DH

HAV/00HQ/LDC/2025/0618 · dispensation from consultation · Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole · decided 7 Apr 2025

The Tribunal granted dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent flat roof repairs at Stevenson Lodge, without deciding whether the costs are reasonable or payable.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordChurchill Retirement Living Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentChurchill Estates Management Limited
BuildingA block, 32 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputerepairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
32 apartments apartments [sic] served by 1 lift
freeholder
Applicant : Churchill Retirement Living Limited
agent
Representative : Churchill Estates Management Limited
outcome
The Applicant is granted dispensation under Section 20ZA of
s20
The Applicant is granted dispensation under Section 20ZA of

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

This decision replaces an earlier one for the same case: 7 Apr 2025.

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.