St Pauls Court Estate, Colet Gardens & Gliddon Road, Hammersmith, London W14 9BN
LON/00AN/LDC/2023/0325 · dispensation from consultation · Hammersmith and Fulham · decided 5 Mar 2024
The Tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for a new gas supply contract running from 1 August 2023 to 31 March 2025 at St Paul's Court estate.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | St Paul's Court Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | An estate, 267 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2023 |
| Items in dispute | utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprises 267 flats in nine blocks
- freeholder
Applicant : St Paul’s Court Limited
- years
for the period of 1 August 2023 until 31 March 2025
- outcome
The Tribunal grants the application for the dispensation of all or any of the consultation requirements provided for by section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
The Tribunal grants the application for the dispensation of all or any of the consultation requirements provided for by section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.