St Paul's Court, 146 Clapham Park Road, London, SW4 7DE
LON/00AY/LDC/2025/0656 · dispensation from consultation · Lambeth · decided 1 Apr 2025
The tribunal granted unconditional dispensation from the Section 20 consultation requirements for urgent lift motor repair works at St Paul's Court, with any challenge to reasonableness or payability left open under section 27A.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | St Paul's Court RTM Company Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Hurford Salvi Carr Property Management Ltd |
| Building | A block, 43 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | insurance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The building comprises 2 purpose-built blocks comprising 43 flats
- freeholder
St Paul’s Court RTM Company Limited, Southern Land Securities Limited.
- agent
made by Hurford Salvi Carr Property Management Ltd on behalf of
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that unconditional dispensation should be granted from the consultation requirements from Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation under Section 20 ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.