St Paul's Chamber, Caroline Street, Jewellery Quarter, Birmingham, B3 1UP
BIR/00CN/LDC/2026/0013 · dispensation from consultation · Birmingham · decided 5 Aug 2026
The Tribunal granted the landlord retrospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for remedial safety works to the automated vehicle access gates, and made no decision on whether the costs are payable or reasonable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Chord Properties Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Centrick Limited |
| Building | A block, 8 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprising 8 residential apartments and one commercial unit
- freeholder
Applicant : Chord Properties Limited
- agent
Representative : Centrick Limited (Ref: Alina Raza)
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of section 20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of section 20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.