St Mildreds Court, Beach Road, Westgate On Sea, Kent, CT8 8AE
CHI/29UN/LVT/2018/0005 · LVT · Thanet · decided 27 Jun 2019
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal rejected the argument that the application was res judicata and varied the leases so that 28 flats contribute equally to service charges from the date of the decision, with Mews paying 1/15th of the insurance, and refused a section 20C order.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | St Mildreds Court Residents Association Limited |
| Management company | St Mildreds Court Residents Association Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 29 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | insurance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
was a block of flats containing 29 flats
- freeholder
the leases of the Flats of which the Applicant is the Immediate Landlord
- outcome
The tribunal determines that it should vary the leases of the Flats of which the Applicant is the Immediate Landlord.
- s20c
decline to make an order pursuant to section 20C
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.