St Johns House, 28 St Johns Road, Eastbourne, East Sussex, BN20 7JB
CHI/21UC/LDC/2023/0082 · dispensation from consultation · Eastbourne · decided 10 Aug 2023
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent electrical repairs to the lift at St Johns House, with no decision on whether the costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | St Johns Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Prestige Property Management Limited |
| Building | A block, 16 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
purpose built residential block of 16 self contained flats
- freeholder
Applicant : St Johns Limited
- agent
Representative : Prestige Property Management Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal therefore grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of electrical repairs to the lift.
- s20
The Tribunal therefore grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of electrical repairs to the lift.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.