St John's House, 1 Springfield Road, Horsham, West Sussex RH12 2PJ
CHI/43UF/LDC/2022/0117 · dispensation from consultation · Horsham · decided 7 Feb 2023
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent repairs to the lift, finding the leaseholders would suffer no relevant prejudice.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | St Johns House (Horsham) Management Ltd |
| Managing agent | HML Group |
| Building | A block, 11 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprising 11 residential leasehold units over three storeys plus basement level
- management company
Applicant : [name] House (Horsham) Management Ltd
- agent
Representative : HML Group
- outcome
The Tribunal grants an order dispensing with the consultation requirements in respect of the remedial works to the lift.
- s20
The Tribunal grants an order dispensing with the consultation requirements in respect of the remedial works to the lift.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.