Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near BL0 9BB

St Johns Court, Ramsbottom, Bury, Lancashire, BL0 9BB

MAN/00BM/LSC/2018/0040 · service charges · Bury · decided 8 Nov 2019

The tribunal found the insurance premiums reasonable and reduced the management fees to 15% of other service charge costs, but the charges are not presently recoverable because the landlord did not provide the required summary of tenants' rights with the demands.

OutcomeReduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordFirst Northern Developments Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentHowards Property Management
BuildingAn estate
Service charge years in dispute2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018
Items in disputeinsurance, management fees
Items disallowed or reducedmanagement fees
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderedthe respondent to pay the applicant £50.00 towards expenses of attending the tribunal

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder
First Northern Developments Limited
agent
represented by Howards Property Management
years
service charges from 2011 to 2018
outcome
The service charges in question are reasonable, with
items reduced
the management charges for 3 years
costs
The Respondent shall pay £50.00 to the Applicant in relation to his expenses

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.