St George's Building, Great George Street, Leeds, LS1 3DL
MAN/00DA/LDC/2021/0013 · dispensation from consultation · Leeds · decided 13 Jul 2021
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent replacement of cladding and balcony decking at St George's Building, because the safety urgency outweighed the prejudice to leaseholders, though this does not decide whether the resulting charges are reasonable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | J H Watson Property Management Ltd |
| Building | A block, 93 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprising 93 residential apartments
- agent
Representative : J H Watson Property Management Ltd
- outcome
We conclude it reasonable in accordance with Section 20ZA(1) of the Act to dispense with the consultation requirements
- s20
The Applicant is dispensed from complying with the consultation requirements in respect of the work specified in the application.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.