St George Wharf, London, SW8 2LS
LON/00AY/LDC/2023/0181 · dispensation from consultation · Lambeth · decided 21 Feb 2024
The Tribunal granted St George unconditional dispensation from the consultation requirements for its 1 January 2012 management agreement with Rendall & Rittner, and found the later agreements with St George and Fairhold were not qualifying long term agreements.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | JB Leitch Ltd |
| Building | An estate, 185 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works, repairs and maintenance, administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
consisting of 1,185 residential units and 29 commercial units
- freeholder
(1) St George South London Limited
- outcome
We consider it reasonable to grant St George unconditional dispensation from all of the consultation requirements
- s20
We consider it reasonable to grant St George unconditional dispensation from all of the consultation requirements
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.