St Andrews House, 38 Graham Road, MAlvern, WR14 2HL
BIR/47UC/LIS/2022/0005 · LIS · Malvern Hills · decided 10 May 2022
figures not yet checkedNo plain-English summary for this decision yet. See the original.
| Outcome | Not payable |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Idris Davies Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 6 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | legal and professional fees |
| Total demanded | £2,000 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the applicant to reimburse the applicant's application fee of £100.00 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- outcome
Our decision is that the Shortfall is not recoverable from the Respondents through the service charge.
- items reduced
Our decision is that the Shortfall is not recoverable from the Respondents through the service charge.
- total demanded
Total £2,000.00
- s20c
We order, under section 20C, that no costs incurred in these proceedings can be regarded as relevant costs to be taken into account in determining any service charge payable by Mr [name], and Mr & Mrs [name].
- costs
we order IDL to reimburse his application fee of £100.00
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.