St Andrews House, 38 Graham Road, Malvern, Worcestershire, WR14 2HL
BIR/47UC/LDC/2020/0017 · dispensation from consultation · Malvern Hills · decided 26 Feb 2021
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for repairing the leaking flat roof above the entrance porch at St Andrews House.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Idris Davies Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block · 6 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
It is let on six long residential leases to the Respondents.
- freeholder
The freehold interest in St Andrews House (“the Property”) is owned by the Applicant.
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation to the Applicant from the obligation to consult under section 20 of the Act in respect of the Works.
- s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation to the Applicant from the obligation to consult under section 20 of the Act in respect of the Works.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.