Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near GL7 5TH

Spring Lake, South Cerney, Gloucestershire GL7 5TH

CHI/23UC/LDC/2022/0054 · dispensation from consultation · Cotswold · decided 14 Jul 2023

The tribunal granted retrospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for the lake bank erosion works, on condition that the landlord pays the leaseholders £1,500 towards the cost of their counsel's advice.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingAn estate · 2 decisions about this building
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputemajor works
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderedthe landlord to pay the respondents £1500 being the costs of taking advice on the application

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

outcome
retrospective dispensation should be granted for works undertaken in installing gabions
s20
retrospective dispensation should be granted for works undertaken in installing gabions
costs
the sum of £1500 being the costs

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

This decision replaces an earlier one for the same case: 14 Jul 2023.

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.