Spire House, Lancaster Gate, London, W2 3NP
LON/00BK/LDC/2021/0253 · dispensation from consultation · Westminster · decided 9 Dec 2021
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent remedial works to the tower and spire of the building, as the leaseholders did not object.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | NP Foot Anstey LLP |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 23 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The building is a residential unit containing 23 separate flats over 6 floors with a residents' car park.
- outcome
The Tribunal grants the applicant dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements in respect of remedial works to the tower and spire at Spire House, Lancaster Gate, London W2 3NP
- s20
The Tribunal grants the applicant dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements in respect of remedial works to the tower and spire at Spire House, Lancaster Gate, London W2 3NP
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.