Spembly Works, 13 New Road Avenue, Chatham, Kent ME4 6AZ
CHI/00LC/LDC/2023/0072 · dispensation from consultation · Medway · decided 4 Oct 2023
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for major works to remove glass and install steel security screening at the building, but made no decision on whether the costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Spembly Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 33 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
Converted building to 33 individual flats currently under prohibition notice.
- outcome
The Applicant is granted dispensation under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 from the consultation requirements imposed on the landlord by Section 20 of the 1985 Act in respect of major works
- s20
The Tribunal finds that it is reasonable to dispense with all of the formal consultation requirements in respect of the major works to the Property.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.