Southview Court, Old London Road Hastings East Sussex TN35 5BN
CHI/21UD/LSC/2022/0129 · service charges · Hastings · decided 10 May 2023
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found nothing payable for 2020 to 2022 because the landlord gave no evidence supporting the demands, made a section 20 cap order and a section 20C order, and ordered repayment of the tenants' fees.
| Outcome | Not payable |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | An estate, 39 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021, 2022 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to repay the applicants' application and hearing fees £300 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
Southview Court comprises 39 two bedroom flats spread across three blocks
- years
and 2021 and 2022 is zero
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that the amount payable by the
- items reduced
The Tribunal determines that the amount payable by the
- total payable
The Tribunal determines that the amount payable by the
- s20c
The Tribunal determines that it will makes such an order in favour of the Applicants
- s20
The Tribunal makes an unlimited order under s20 Landlord
- costs
the sum of £300 representing their application
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.