Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near BN21 1LG

South View, Upperton Road, Eastbourne, East Sussex, BN21 1LG

HAV/21UC/LSC/2025/0625 · service charges · Eastbourne · decided 8 Dec 2025

The Tribunal decided that the balconies form part of the main walls and exterior of the building under the lease, so the landlord can recover the cost of complying with its repair obligations as service charges if properly incurred and demanded, and it refused the leaseholders' request that the landlord's costs of these proceedings not be added to the service charge.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Refused
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordSouth View (Maintenance) Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 44 flats
Service charge years in dispute2025
Items in disputemajor works
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
comprising of 44 apartments
outcome
The Tribunal finds under Section 27(A) Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 that the Respondent is liable to pay service charges validly incurred and demanded (if any)
s20c
The Tribunal dismisses the Respondents application under Section 20C Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.