South Park Court, 4 South Park, Gerrards Cross, Buckinghamshire SL9 8HG
CAM/11UE/LDC/2022/0030 · dispensation from consultation · Buckinghamshire · decided 6 Oct 2022
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent works to waterproof the roof water tank housings at South Park Court, as the application was unopposed.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Oak End Practice Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Alba Management Services |
| Building | A block, 9 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
described in the application as a block of nine purpose-built flats
- freeholder
Applicant : Oak End Practice Limited
- agent
Representative : Alba Management Services
- outcome
The tribunal determines under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 to dispense with all the consultation requirements
- s20
to dispense with all the consultation requirements in relation to the works described in the application form
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.