Sobraon Heights, Cambrai Close, Lincoln, LN1 3UL
MAN/32UD/LDC/2021/0066 · dispensation from consultation · Lincoln · decided 26 Apr 2022
The tribunal granted Longhurst Group Limited dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent roof repairs at Sobraon Heights, finding the health and safety risks outweighed the prejudice to leaseholders, while noting this does not decide whether the resulting charges are reasonable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Longhurst Group Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 36 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Property is a block of 36 flats built in 2005
- freeholder
Applicant : Longhurst Group Limited
- outcome
Longhurst Group Limited applies to the Tribunal under Section 20ZA of Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (the Act) for dispensation from the consultation requirements
- s20
We conclude it reasonable in accordance with Section 20ZA(1) of the Act to dispense with the consultation requirements
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.