Snowdon Mount, 4 Snowdon Road, Bournemouth, Dorset, BH4 9HL
CHI/00HN/LDC/2021/0029 · dispensation from consultation · Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole · decided 29 Jun 2021
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for continued major structural works to the roof and structure costing an estimated £226,000, and refused the leaseholder representative's requests to postpone the decision.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | RMB 102 Ltd. |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 14 flats · 3 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021 |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £226,000 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
the 14 apartments at the property
- freeholder
Applicant : RMB 102 Ltd.
- years
the period 1st January – 31st December 2021
- outcome
The Applicant is granted dispensation from the consultation requirements for continued major works
- total demanded
estimated in the application to cost £226,000.00
- s20
The Applicant is granted dispensation from the consultation requirements for continued major works
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.