Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near BN21 3HQ

SIA Court, 49 Pevensy Road, Eastbourne, East Sussex BN21 3HQ

CHI/21UC/LDC/2020/0007 · dispensation from consultation · Eastbourne · decided 27 Feb 2020

The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the s.20 consultation requirements for scaffolding and roof repairs at SIA Court, reducing the lessees' response time to 7 days, while making no finding on whether costs are reasonable or payable.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordDuvacourt Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 11 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputerepairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder
Applicant : Duvacourt Limited
outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of the provision of scaffolding and subsequent repairs to the roof
s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.