Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near BN21 3HQ

SIA Court, 49 Pevensey Road, Eastbourne, East Sussex BN21 3HQ

CHI/21UC/LDC/2024/0093 · dispensation from consultation · Eastbourne · decided 5 Jul 2024

The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent replacement of the defective fire alarm system, without deciding whether the costs are reasonable or payable.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordDuvacourt Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 16 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputeother
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
Converted block of 16 self-contained residential flats
freeholder
Applicant : Duvacourt Limited
outcome
The Applicant is granted dispensation under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 from the consultation requirements
s20
The Applicant is granted dispensation under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 from the consultation requirements imposed on the landlord by Section 20 of the 1985 Act

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.