Sesame Apartments, 4 Holman Road, London SW11 3PG
LON/00BJ/LDC/2020/0234 · dispensation from consultation · Wandsworth · decided 8 Feb 2021
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal granted retrospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for the cladding and façade fire safety works, on condition that the landlord pays the leaseholders' reasonable professional costs of the application and that the landlord's costs of the application are not charged to the service charge.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Adriatic Land 3 Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | London Residential Management Limited |
| Building | A block, 81 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the applicant to pay the respondents' reasonable professional costs of the section 20ZA application as a condition of di |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
81 apartments on floors 1 to 7
- freeholder
[name] 3 Limited is the freeholder of the property
- agent
the applicant’s agent, London Residential Management Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal grants the application for dispensation from statutory
- s20c
should not be regarded as relevant costs to be taken into account in the service charge payable by the respondents.
- s20
the application is necessary by reason of the applicant having not complied with the relevant consultation requirements of section 20 of the Act
- costs
the tribunal are prepared to make it a condition of its decision that the applicant pay the respondents’ reasonable professional costs
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.