Scott Schedule Southwyck House, London SW9 8TT
LON/00AY/LSC/2024/0622 · service charges · Lambeth · decided 11 Nov 2025
figures not yet checkedThe Tribunal allowed several items to be conceded or reduced by the landlord, found some charges reasonable and payable, and ruled on consultation, overheads and other issues in the main decision, in a service charge dispute over Southwyck House for 2018/19 to 2023/24.
| Outcome | Not stated |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made (from the later costs ruling on this case, linked below) |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, insurance, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- years
23/24: £281,434.65
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
Later rulings on the same case (costs, section 20C, permission to appeal): 5 Jan 2026, 5 Jan 2026.
This decision replaces an earlier one for the same case: 11 Nov 2025.
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.