Scarisbrick Court, Scarisbrick New Road, Southport PR8 6QF
MAN/00CA/LDC/2024/0005 · dispensation from consultation · Sefton · decided 26 Jul 2024
The tribunal granted the landlord retrospective dispensation from the Section 20 consultation requirements for replacing the lift at Scarisbrick Court, while leaseholders keep their right to challenge the reasonableness of the costs later.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Redwing Living Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 27 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
upon each of the 27 leaseholders of flats within the Scarisbrick Court development
- freeholder
The Applicant is the freeholder of the development and the party responsible
- outcome
The dispensation sought by the Applicant from compliance with Section 20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 is granted.
- s20
The dispensation sought by the Applicant from compliance with Section 20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 is granted.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.