Sandown House, 1 High Street, Esher, Surrey KT10 9SL
CHI/43UB/LSC/2018/0084 · service charges · Elmbridge · decided 10 Sep 2019
The tribunal found the major works charges for 2017-2018 reasonable because the applicants did not establish an arguable case that the works were defective, and it refused a s20C order.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Long Term Reversions Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2017 |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : Long Term Reversions Ltd
- years
the amounts demanded by the Respondents for the service charge years 2017 to 2018 are reasonable
- outcome
the Tribunal determines that the amounts demanded by the Respondents for the service charge years 2017 to 2018 are reasonable
- s20c
declines to do so
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.