Sandlewood Court, Tarragon Road, Maidstone, Kent, ME16 0ZG

CHI/29UH/LSC/2021/0105 · service charges · Maidstone · decided 22 Feb 2023

figures not yet checked

The tribunal found the respondent had sufficiently scrutinised the head lessor's charges and made no reductions, but made orders preventing the respondent from passing its litigation costs on to leaseholders through the service or administration charges.

Outcome	Payable as demanded
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Order made
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Leaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlord	Hyde Housing Association Ltd
Management company	none named
Managing agent	none named
Building	A block
Service charge years in dispute	2019, 2020
Items in dispute	cleaning and grounds, major works, other, reserve fund, utilities
Items disallowed or reduced	none stated
Total demanded	not stated as one figure
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	none stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

agent: its managing agent, Glenny LLP
years: for the years 2019 -2020 and 2020 - 2021
outcome: the method of scrutiny is sufficient
s20c: In the circumstances the Tribunal makes an order pursuant to the

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.