San Remo Towers, Sea Road, Bournemouth, BH5 1JT
CHI/00HN/LSC/2022/0126 · service charges · Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole · decided 27 Apr 2023
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal decided that flat-and-parking-space leaseholders cannot be charged an extra share of the garage roof works beyond the flat leaseholders' share, that professional and legal fees are recoverable in principle if reasonably incurred, that it has no jurisdiction over the parking space leases, and made a s.20C order in the applicant's favour.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | San Remo Towers Freehold Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 183 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | legal and professional fees, major works, other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
San Remo Towers, Sea Road, Bournemouth (SRT) is a development of 183 residential flats
- freeholder
Respondents : San Remo Towers Freehold Limited
- outcome
The tribunal does not have jurisdiction to determine issues in respect of the payment and reasonableness of service charges (Maintenance Charges) that may be payable under the terms of the Parking Space leases.
- s20c
The tribunal determines pursuant to section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 that all or any of the costs incurred by the Respondent in connection with these proceedings are not to be regarded as relevant costs
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.