Ryger House, 11-15 Arlington Street, London SW1A 1RD
LON/00BK/LDC/2021/0090 · dispensation from consultation · Westminster · decided 23 Aug 2021
The tribunal rejected the leaseholders' application for costs under rule 13(1)(b) following an earlier dispensation decision, refusing to recover the foreign law firm's invoice and the applicant's own costs, and made no order as to costs.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Ryger Management Co. Ltd. |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | not stated |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- management company
Respondent : Ryger Management Co. Ltd.
- outcome
The Tribunal rejects Rahman [name] and Zahra [name]’s application under rule 13(1)(b) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013 and makes no order as to costs.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
This decision replaces an earlier one for the same case: 1 Jun 2021.
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.