Royal Court, Kings Road, Reading, Berkshire RG1 4AE
CAM/00MC/LSC/2018/0063 · service charges · Reading · decided 4 Feb 2019
The tribunal found the estimated service charge of £66,041 for 2018/19 reasonable and payable by the lessees, and ordered them to reimburse the landlord's £300 tribunal fees.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Mididol Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 35 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2018 |
| Items in dispute | major works, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £66,041 |
| Total found payable | £66,041 |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondents to reimburse the applicant's tribunal fees £300 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a 6 storey building containing 35 flats
- freeholder
Applicant : Mididol Limited
- agent
Chrisaliz Management Services
- years
estimated service charge for the year 2018/19
- outcome
is reasonable and is payable by the lessees
- total demanded
in the sum of £66,041.00 is reasonable
- total payable
in the sum of £66,041.00 is reasonable and is payable by the lessees
- costs
the Respondents shall pay the Applicant £300 within 28 days of this Decision
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.