Royal Court, 56 Bugle Street, Southampton, Hampshire, SO14 2DX
HAV/00MS/LDC/2024/0647 · dispensation from consultation · Southampton · decided 8 Jan 2025
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent works to make Royal Court watertight after water ingress into Flat 1, but made no decision on whether the costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Elmbirch Properties Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | BW Residential Limited |
| Building | A block, 6 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
BLOCK OF 6 FLATS, WITH 2 ENTRANCES WITH A CAR PARK TO THE
- freeholder
Applicant : Elmbirch Properties Ltd
- agent
Representative : BW Residential Limited
- outcome
The Applicant is granted dispensation under Section 20ZA of
- s20
The Applicant is granted dispensation under Section 20ZA of
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.