Royal Avenue House, 1 Royal Avenue, London, SW3 4QD
LON/00AW/LDC/2024/0036 · dispensation from consultation · Kensington and Chelsea · decided 1 Nov 2024
The Tribunal granted retrospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent downpipe repair works, invoiced at £15,984, carried out after a leak, but did not decide whether the costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Northumberland & Durham Property Trust Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Grainger Residential Management Limited |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £15,984 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
block containing twenty flats spread over five floors and situated above
- freeholder
Durham Property Trust Limited is the head lessee of the Property and
- agent
A senior Block Manager at Grainger Residential Management
- outcome
that it is reasonable to dispense with the statutory
- total demanded
The invoice is for £15,984.
- s20
that it is reasonable to dispense with the statutory
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.