Rosewood House and Pippins Court, Vauxhall Grove, Vauxhall, London, SW8 1TB
LON/00AY/LDC/2019/0207 · dispensation from consultation · Lambeth · decided 25 Aug 2020
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal dispensed with the statutory consultation requirements for urgent parapet wall works and found the estimated major works charge of £66,422.09 plus VAT payable, refusing a section 20C order.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Metropolitan Housing Trust Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 30 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2020 |
| Items in dispute | major works, other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £66,422.09 |
| Total found payable | £66,422.09 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
There are 30 flats in Rosewood House and 12 flats in Pippins Court
- freeholder
Applicant : Metropolitan Housing Trust Ltd
- years
estimated service charges for the year 2020 in respect of the major works
- outcome
the amount payable in respect of estimated charges for major works is £66,422.09 ex VAT
- total demanded
the sum of £66,422.09 plus VAT is payable by the Respondents in respect of the estimated service charges
- total payable
the amount payable in respect of estimated charges for major works is £66,422.09 ex VAT
- s20c
the tribunal determines not to make an order under section 20C of the 1985 Act
- s20
The tribunal determines to exercise its discretion to dispense with the consultation requirements contained in Schedule 4(2)
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.