Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near EN3 6DF

Regents Court 1 Swan and Pike Road Enfield EN3 6DF

LON/00AK/LDC/2024/0195 · dispensation from consultation · Enfield · decided 21 Jan 2025

The tribunal granted the landlord retrospective dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for the roofing repairs carried out at Regents Court in summer 2024, without conditions, and this does not decide whether the costs are payable or reasonable.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordSeedwell Limited
Management companyHallmark Property Management Ltd
Managing agentHallmark Ltd
BuildingA block, 6 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputerepairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
containing 6 apartments
freeholder
Applicant : Seedwell Limited
agent
the Applicant’s managing agent Hallmark Ltd applied
outcome
The Tribunal unconditionally grants the application for retrospective dispensation
s20
The Applicant did not comply with the statutory consultation process but made a pre-emptive application to the Tribunal for dispensation

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.