Regent Court, Stoke Poges Lane, Slough, Berks SL1 3LG
CAM/00MD/LDC/2019/0016 · dispensation from consultation · Slough · decided 12 Jul 2019
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from all the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent damp and render repair works carried out at Regent Court in February 2019.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Southern Land Securities Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 14 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a development of 14 self-contained
- freeholder
Landlord : Southern Land Securities Limited
- years
works undertaken in or about February 2019
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that an order for dispensation under section 20ZA of the 1985 Act shall be made dispensing with all of the consultation requirements
- s20
The Tribunal determines that an order for dispensation under section 20ZA of the 1985 Act shall be made dispensing with all of the consultation requirements
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.