Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near KT2 5EL

Regal House, 80 Richmond Road, Kingston Upon Thames, Surrey, KT2 5EL

LON/00AX/LDC/2020/0204 · dispensation from consultation · Kingston upon Thames · decided 18 May 2021

The tribunal granted dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent roof repairs at Regal House, Kingston, because the roof was in urgent need of repair and no leaseholder objected.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordHolden Homes (Southern) Ltd.
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 4 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputerepairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
converted Victorian town house consisting of four flats across four floors
freeholder
the freeholder Holden Homes (Southern) Ltd.
outcome
The Tribunal determines that the statutory consultation requirements shall be dispensed with in respect of repairs to the roof of the property.
s20
the statutory consultation requirements shall be dispensed with in respect of repairs to the roof of the property

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.