Rapala Court, 2 Midway Quay,Eastbourne,East Sussex BN23 5DB
HAV/21UC/LDC/2025/0667 · dispensation from consultation · Eastbourne · decided 15 Jul 2025
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent replacement of the automatic transfer switch in the firefighting lift at Rapala Court, but made no decision on whether the cost is payable or reasonable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Redrow Homes (Southern) Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Anthem Management Limited |
| Building | A block, 37 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £9,042.67 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
contains a total of 37 flats
- freeholder
Although Redrow Homes (Southern) Limited is the freeholder of Rapala Court
- agent
Representative : Anthem Management Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that dispensation is granted under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- total demanded
totalling £9,042.67
- s20
The Tribunal determines that dispensation from the consultation requirements in Section 20 of the Act is granted.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.