Radstone Court, Woking, Surrey, GU22 7NB
HAV/43UM/LDC/2026/0066 · dispensation from consultation · Woking · decided 22 Jun 2026
The tribunal granted the landlord's company dispensation from the Section 20 consultation requirements for urgent works to replace a leaking soil vent pipe, but made no finding on whether the costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Radstone Court (Woking) Residents Association Ltd |
| Management company | Radstone Court (Woking) Residents Association Ltd |
| Managing agent | HES Estate Management |
| Building | An estate |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprising fifty seven, one-bedroom and two-bedroom apartments
- freeholder
Applicant : [name] Court (Woking) Residents
- agent
Representative : HES Estate Management
- outcome
The Applicant is granted dispensation under Section 20ZA of
- s20
The Applicant is granted dispensation under Section 20ZA of
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.