Radnor House 1272 London Road Norbury London SW16 4EA
LON/00AH/LDC/2019/0192 · dispensation from consultation · Croydon · decided 9 Dec 2019
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the remaining statutory consultation requirements for the works to replace the combustible larch timber cladding on the building, but made no finding on the reasonableness of the cost.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 113 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
It comprises 113 residential flats of which 40 are demised to Places for People Homes
- outcome
The tribunal dispenses with the consultation requirements in respect of the qualifying works which are the subject of this application
- s20
The tribunal dispenses with the consultation requirements in respect of the qualifying works which are the subject of this application
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.